Go mobile or go home. That’s the advice I keep repeating to organizations planning to maximize the business and reputation opportunities available at the 2012 political conventions. But the deeper question for political watchers is the impact social media will have on the actual November election.
In a recent Wall Street Journal article on the topic, Andy Kessler chronicled the evolution of media influences in campaigns from the first televised debate between Nixon and JFK in 1952 to the “make your own Obama commercial” craze that swept YouTube in 2008. Today’s candidates are in a constant race not only to top their competition in the quarterly financial filings but in the daily tally of Facebook fans and Twitter followers.
But as Kessler notes, when it comes to social media influence in campaigns, the true power lies in quality over quantity. “Those with social media influence are most likely to help campaigns convert interest into votes,” Kessler writes.
Converting interest to action is the holy grail of advocacy and political campaigns. And for that to happen, the message must do much more than simply raise awareness. Target audiences (eligible and likely to vote citizens, in the case of elections) must feel the message being received is relevant, empowering and urgent. An individual’s beliefs and attitudes along with intentions are the best predictors of behavior. And the quality of the messenger is an important link in that equation.
So, the question in the 2012 elections with regard to social media impacts may not be about how many friends of fans Obama or Fill-in-the-Blank Presidential Nominee may be able to attract – but who are the individuals putting up those virtual yard signs in front of their electronic house, and what do they say.






